Why conebeamexperts is best for Hard-contrast Imaging?
1 episode
Creator
Description
According to an investigative radiology conebeamexperts , there are no differences in image quality or dose between cone-beam and spiral computed tomography. Further studies revealed that conebeamexperts is a better imaging technique for soft tissue imaging than CBCT. These results were achieved by Alexander A. Schegerer (Doctor of Medical and Occupation Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection Neuherberg) and his colleagues. The two imaging methods were compared on the basis image quality and dose.
Schegerer states that conebeamexperts is used extensively in hard tissue imaging in different regions. Schegerer stated that cone-beam computed Tomography (CBCT) has been used in many clinical areas, including neurology, olaryngology and cardiology, as well as musculoskeletal imaging and urology. There are very few reports on the radiation doses and image quality of CBCT.
The effective radiation dose for conebeamexperts was 0.35 mSv-18.1 mSv. While local skin dose reached up to 190 mGy, it ranged between 18.1 mSv and 18.1 mSv. Schegerer explained that the MSCT convolution kernel determined the effective radiation dose needed to achieve the same contrast-to noise ratio with CBCT or MSCT. The MSCT dose was lower than the corresponding CBCT dose, but higher than the dose for a hard kernel.
During the comparison of the two imaging technologies it was discovered that images taken with conebeamexperts at tube voltages 85/90 kV (p) were at least half the size of those taken at 103/11 kV (p) at any spiral frequency. Schegerer stated that CBCT produces images with medium noise levels, and medium spatial resolution at the same dose, as MSCT. It's well-suited for visualizing abdomen hard-contrast objects with low image noise and patient dose.
The study revealed that the radiation field conebeamexperts must be adjusted to the exposed body area in order to maximize patient exposure.
Fans also read
Fans also read
The Spider and the Fly
Novel Drama 3.5k likes
Fans also read
Wild Bird
Novel Drama 346 likes
Fans also read
Nature's Revenge: Between Heaven and Hell
Novel Drama 5 likes
Fans also read
What Makes a Monster
Novel BL 70k likes
Fans also read
Invisible Bonds
Novel LGBTQ+ 2.2k likes
Fans also read
Blood Moon
Novel BL 45.6k likes
Creator
Details
According to an investigative radiology conebeamexperts , there are no differences in image quality or dose between cone-beam and spiral computed tomography. Further studies revealed that conebeamexperts is a better imaging technique for soft tissue imaging than CBCT. These results were achieved by Alexander A. Schegerer (Doctor of Medical and Occupation Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection Neuherberg) and his colleagues. The two imaging methods were compared on the basis image quality and dose.
Schegerer states that conebeamexperts is used extensively in hard tissue imaging in different regions. Schegerer stated that cone-beam computed Tomography (CBCT) has been used in many clinical areas, including neurology, olaryngology and cardiology, as well as musculoskeletal imaging and urology. There are very few reports on the radiation doses and image quality of CBCT.
The effective radiation dose for conebeamexperts was 0.35 mSv-18.1 mSv. While local skin dose reached up to 190 mGy, it ranged between 18.1 mSv and 18.1 mSv. Schegerer explained that the MSCT convolution kernel determined the effective radiation dose needed to achieve the same contrast-to noise ratio with CBCT or MSCT. The MSCT dose was lower than the corresponding CBCT dose, but higher than the dose for a hard kernel.
During the comparison of the two imaging technologies it was discovered that images taken with conebeamexperts at tube voltages 85/90 kV (p) were at least half the size of those taken at 103/11 kV (p) at any spiral frequency. Schegerer stated that CBCT produces images with medium noise levels, and medium spatial resolution at the same dose, as MSCT. It's well-suited for visualizing abdomen hard-contrast objects with low image noise and patient dose.
The study revealed that the radiation field conebeamexperts must be adjusted to the exposed body area in order to maximize patient exposure.
Fans also read
Fans also read
The Spider and the Fly
Novel Drama 3.5k likes
Fans also read
Wild Bird
Novel Drama 346 likes
Fans also read
Nature's Revenge: Between Heaven and Hell
Novel Drama 5 likes
Fans also read
What Makes a Monster
Novel BL 70k likes
Fans also read
Invisible Bonds
Novel LGBTQ+ 2.2k likes
Fans also read
Blood Moon
Novel BL 45.6k likes