Um... Excuse me deity type person, but that logic is flawed. A person is a person, deity or otherwise. Simply because you use utilitarian logic, whereby you claim that because a deity either holds some greater degrees of sentience or importance to the overall scheme of universal consequence, does not change the fact that you exist (at least, in this circumstance) to make human existence possible. In a way, you could argue that your sole reason for existing is as a consequence of humanity, or a product of helping us. If you were to decide that even one life is irrelevant in comparison to that of a deity's life, then that would invalidate the whole point of creation, whereby people would be valueless, and your who universe a cosmic joke. For example, if deities are *so* much more important, then why are your ethics so utterlyfucking useless? Why do you hold political structures that do not seek to maintain optimized prosperity for all? The best we can determine is that you are flawed, but overly powered, and therefore don't change much because you have little natural conflict.

Subsequently, you actually REQUIRE humans in order to grow, which means that humans by contrast are actually MORE important that gods, because without us, gods would be fixed, inefficient, broken, boring, and likely by extension, bored out of their frigging minds. By having us to view, interact with, challenge, and in turn be challenged by, you change, grow, and prosper, and thus, if you tell Death that Andrew's life is worth MORE than Era's, then that means that gods being dull, broken, and inefficient is ethical and accepted, thereby making you tyrannical and unjustified to hold the power you possess, thereby making the only thing universally good in all of spacetime would by for your destruction and replacement by something better and kinder, wherefore, I argue, if you wish to save your sorry existence, you get down and BEG!